Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephanie Bolyard's avatar

This resonates deeply, and I think it is one of the most important shifts from being a strong contributor to becoming a trusted leader.

What your story captures so well is that the real expectation was not just awareness. It was ownership.

Early in my career, I believed identifying gaps was the value. If you could clearly articulate a problem, especially one others were overlooking, that felt like the contribution. Over time, I have learned that the moment you raise something, you have implicitly volunteered to help shape the path forward, whether you intended to or not.

What has been powerful for me is a slight reframing. It is not just about bringing solutions. It is about bringing a way to think about the solution.

In complex spaces like policy, environmental systems, and emerging contaminants, there is rarely a clean or immediate answer. What leaders are really looking for is how you frame the problem, what options you see even if they are imperfect, what tradeoffs you understand, and where you would start.

That shift from identifying to structuring is where influence really begins to build.

One lesson I would add that builds on yours is this. If you bring a problem without a solution, you create work for others. If you bring a problem with a structured path forward, you create momentum. Leaders respond to momentum.

And the image of the IBM Selectric memo going through vacuum tubes is incredible. The boldness of sending that memo in the first place is a leadership signal on its own.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?